[interchange-docs] [/page]

[Peter]

On 02/25/2007 05:15 AM, Davor Ocelic wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 03:09:14 -0800
> Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote:
> 
>> In the Standard Syntax section of
>> <http://icdevgroup.org/xmldocs/glossary/ITL.html> there is a "note" that
>> references that [/page] is a macro.  This is a really bad example
>> considering that [/page] is now obsolete.
> 
> There is also a "note", immediately after, that </a> is preferred,
> so I don't see a problem.


Last time I checked "preferred" was not the same as "required".  IMO it
should either not be mentioned at all or a note stating it is OBSOLETE
should be put there.  It really is bad form, IMO to use an example that
is obsolete.

Peter