[ic] Cluster and/or load balancing question

[Jon]

    Some interesting thoughts going on there... Makes
we wonder where you guys might be planning or thinking of
taking IC ?  If you have any plans would you mind sharing
them.

Jon

Dan Browning wrote:

> >One might also consider separating www/ic into two machines.  We don't
> >use apache on our vanilla sites; where we do, it's a mod_perl, mod_ssl,
> >mod_rewrite behemoth with all the bells and whistles
> >and that really hammers a machine compared to WN or Roxen.  A straight
> >version might be a lot easier on the machine, I'd guess.  We've found
> >separating those mod_* apaches from ic makes a huge difference.  YMMV.
> >
> >
> >cfm
>
> Yes, I agree.  There has also been a lot of work done in 4.9 to reduce
> memory footprint (including Mike Heins' great tag breakout as well as Jon
> Jensen's mod_perl integration).  Separating out IC, http, and db are always
> good measures for performance improvement, however.
>
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | Dan Browning, Kavod Technologies <db@kavod.com>
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> interchange-users mailing list
> interchange-users@icdevgroup.org
> http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users