[ic] Re: [interchange-docs]http://www.icdevgroup.org/xmldocs/iccattut/MinimalCatalog.html

Davor Ocelic docelic at mail.inet.hr
Mon Apr 3 12:54:11 EDT 2006

On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:54:38 -0600 (MDT)
Jon Jensen <jon at endpoint.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Davor Ocelic wrote:
> >> I think the docs list is about to be opened up.  It's original use was
> >> not for docs discussions, but for docs-specific CVS commit notices.
> >> It's only recently that a few discussion threads have popped up in there.
> >>
> >> Perhaps we could start a new (public) "interchange-docs" mail list for
> >> documentation discussion and submissions, and keep the current "docs"
> >> list for CVS commit notices only (no posting, and the "Reply-To" header
> >> set to direct followups to interchange-docs).
> >>
> >> The interchange-users list will suffice as a public docs discussion area
> >> in the mean time.
> >
> > Since I am the only one doing commits, I don't think separation to two lists
> > is justified. Especially since there isn't many subscribers either.
> Davor,
> One aspect I like about Kevin's suggestion here is that the name 
> interchange-docs fits in with the rest of our mailing lists which all 
> start with interchange-. In fact, it wouldn't be bad to rename "docs" to 
> interchange-docs-cvs, IMO.

Well, I'm just plugging-in in the existing infrastructure. One thing I
already did weeks ago, was changing visible prefix from [docs] to
[interchange-docs] to be more in style.

Ok, anyway, I'll see what would it take to rename a mailman list, and let
you all know.


More information about the interchange-users mailing list