[ic] Using counter_tid and getting relevant errors, possible?

Mike Heins mike at perusion.com
Sun Mar 12 16:37:13 EST 2006


Quoting Paul Jordan (paul at gishnetwork.com):
> 
> 
> Dear List
> 
> Upon making the change to use a transaction counter as opposed to
> etc/order.number pre-accepted transaction, I followed this:
> 
> http://www.interchange.rtfm.info/whatsnew/51.html
> 
> Stating to bascially add
> 
> 	counter_tid    etc/transaction.number
> 
> 
> What I have found is that does not work, but instead (as the new distro
> ships) add it to the default route:
> 
> Route   default   counter_tid     logs/tid.counter
> 
> In the what's new file is also a note:
> 
> 	If you use counter_tid, you *must* set set the 
> 	order number in your logging file if you want 
> 	it to be available.
> 
> I don't know where this refers to.

Look in etc/log_transaction -- search for mv_order_number.

-- 
Mike Heins
Perusion -- Expert Interchange Consulting    http://www.perusion.com/
phone +1.765.647.1295  tollfree 800-949-1889 <mike at perusion.com>

Find the grain of truth in criticism, chew it, and swallow
it. -- anonymous


More information about the interchange-users mailing list