[ic] "apply changes" vs. restart

Glenn McCalley glenn at bnetmd.net
Tue Jun 12 19:15:56 UTC 2012


>> -----Original Message----- 
>> From: Glenn McCalley
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:37 AM
>> To: interchange-users at icdevgroup.org
>> Subject: [ic] "apply changes" vs. restart
>>
>> Hi there!
>>
>> Is there any difference between doing "apply changes" to an individual 
>> store
>> vs. an interchange restart to update just that one store?  We have a
>> customer who claims that a template change would not take effect until 
>> the
>> restart was done.  error.log shows that he did in fact apply changes.
>>
>> Glenn.
>>
>>

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "d davenport" <dances_with_peons at live.com>
> To: <interchange-users at icdevgroup.org>
> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2012 11:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [ic] "apply changes" vs. restart
>

> I've seen cases where changes weren't applied til a full restart.  It's 
> been a while, though, and IC seemed kinda inconsistent about what it 
> wouldn't apply changes for.  I always just considered it a bug that wasn't 
> worth fixing.  (IC restarts fast enough, the link program/module/whatever 
> doesn't mind waiting a few seconds for it to come back up, and I'm one of 
> two people that mess with the catalogs, so it isn't restarting all that 
> often anyway.)
> /
>
Thanks for the comment.  We've never had any problems until these guys and I
was just wondering if there was some corner of a catalog that doesn't get 
kicked.
Then they said the catalog wasn't working at all and I found they had loaded 
up a
blank catalog.cfg to see if there would be an error message on "apply 
changes" and
wondering why the store wouldn't come up.  Yes dear, that does hose a 
catalog...
*sigh*
Joint projects are fascinating.
Glenn.





More information about the interchange-users mailing list