[ic] Time for new hardware?

Stefan Hornburg (Racke) racke at linuxia.de
Tue Sep 20 16:16:02 UTC 2016


I will take care of that after the Perl Dancer conference

Regards Racke

On 20 September 2016 17:03:48 CEST, Grant <emailgrant at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I've been making a lot of optimizations lately and I think I'm
>to the
>>>>>>>>> point where my 4 cores just aren't able to keep up with demand
>during
>>>>>>>>> peak traffic hours each day.  Pages load quickly when I see
>fewer than
>>>>>>>>> 4 busy interchange processes in top but things slow down
>drastically
>>>>>>>>> after that.  Once I'm OK with the degree of optimization my
>ITL pages
>>>>>>>>> have undergone and I'm not IO-bound or memory-bound, is it
>time to
>>>>>>>>> throw CPU at the problem?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm a little puzzled because I've seen my server perform much
>better
>>>>>>>>> under much greater loads in the past.  I thought my growing
>mysql
>>>>>>>>> tables could be the problem so I set up indexes and it has
>helped but
>>>>>>>>> my server still struggles under loads it used to handle
>without issue.
>>>>>>>>> I did notice that my tables are split about 50/50 between
>InnoDB and
>>>>>>>>> MyISAM and I'd like to make all of them InnoDB.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Grant
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, I would recommend to switch all them to InnoDB for
>consistency
>>>>>>>> and real transactions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You probably can find sufficient resources on MySQL
>optimization with
>>>>>>>> InnoDB if that is your bottleneck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually IO doesn't seem to be a bottleneck at this point.  It
>seems
>>>>>>> to be CPU as things slow down once I have 4 busy interchange
>processes
>>>>>>> on my quad-core CPU and iotop does not show much activity at
>that
>>>>>>> point.  Besides ITL optimization, is this a clear case of
>needing a
>>>>>>> faster CPU and more cores or is there anything else to consider
>first?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> May I ask which webserver you are using?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm using nginx reverse proxied to apache2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you consider to get rid of Apache?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm certainly planning to do that but if I watch top it looks like
>my
>>>>> apache2 processes *barely* get above idle even when the web server
>is
>>>>> under heavy load.  The interchange processes get hammered.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which mode/settings do you use for the Interchange server? How
>>>> do you connect Nginx and Interchange?
>>>
>>>
>>> Here are my active traffic settings from interchange.cfg:
>>>
>>> PreFork                 Yes
>>> StartServers            12
>>> MaxServers              0
>>> MaxRequestsPerChild     100
>>> HouseKeeping            2
>>> PIDcheck                3600
>>> ChildLife               3600
>>>
>>> apache2 listens on a particular port and nginx sends page requests
>to
>>> apache2 over that port via the proxy_pass directive.  apache2 then
>>> hands off to interchange via Interchange::Link.
>>
>> We are using Nginx + FastCGI to connect to Interchange in most of our
>> installations now.
>
>
>That's where I want to end up.  Is there good info online on how to
>connect nginx and IC directly?
>
>- Grant
>
>_______________________________________________
>interchange-users mailing list
>interchange-users at icdevgroup.org
>http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.icdevgroup.org/pipermail/interchange-users/attachments/20160920/ebf50886/attachment.html>


More information about the interchange-users mailing list