[interchange-docs] Invalid XHTML?

Mon Apr 3 02:04:42 EDT 2006

On 04/02/2006 03:18 AM, Davor Ocelic wrote:
>  We'll have to see whether we value this specific xhtml compatibility
>  enough to use a different approach to inserting <meta> tags (one that
>  would put them inside <head />), or we will simply remove the xhtml
>  icon.

If you're going to use xhtml at all then it would pay to make sure it's 
valid.  I've seen browsers that refuse to display the page if it doesn't 
pass a validation check.

Peter