[ic] Problem with option and migration from old catalog (4.6.x) to 5.6.0

Alessandro Poletto pollok at gmail.com
Wed Aug 6 14:29:44 UTC 2008


I've discovered the problem in a file that was modified in the
admininistration (pages/admin of the catalog).

Deleting the pages/admin/item_option_old.html and using the version in
the 5.6 distribution all works fine.

Many thanks to all


On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:02 AM,  <ic at 3edge.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: interchange-users-bounces at icdevgroup.org [mailto:interchange-
>> users-bounces at icdevgroup.org] On Behalf Of Alessandro Poletto
>> Sent: woensdag 6 augustus 2008 11:49
>> To: interchange-users at icdevgroup.org
>> Subject: Re: [ic] Problem with option and migration from old catalog
>> (4.6.x) to 5.6.0
>>
>> Many many many thanks for your help...
>>
>> but the problem persist...
>>
>> the problem is strange and no logging is made so, for me, is really
>> difficult to understand what happen!
>>
>> Is really important that I found a solution!
>
> If you have access to the Interchange Core code, add additional logDebug
> lines (or removed the # from already existing logDebug lines) to the various
> modules to create your own logging and see where things are going wrong.
> Also make sure you have Debug switched on and are sure that you are writing
> to the correct Debug log ... For example, set in your interchange.cfg:
> - Variable  DEBUG  1
> - DebugFile /tmp/debug.log
>
> In a default interchange.cfg you probably should be able to find these lines
> to be existing. Restart interchange and see if anything gets written in your
> debug log.
>
> As you are working with an existing heavily customized site, it is near to
> impossible for anyone to come up with a working solution, unless they dive
> into your system/code to find out what is going on....
>
> CU,
>
> Gert
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote:
>> > On 07/31/2008 12:48 AM, Alessandro Poletto wrote:
>> >> I've taken an old catalog developed on interchange 4.6.x (I am not
>> >> sure because I've only a backup of datas).
>> >>
>> >> After some simple adjustment all works perfectly but a problem
>> appear
>> >> when in the administration I go to modify an option, the interface
>> >> propose me to change the type of the option as "matrix option
>> multiple
>> >> widgets" (that is correct), when I confirm it rollback to the same
>> >> page.
>> >>
>> >> I've thinked that in 4.6 the product/option structure was based on
>> two tables:
>> >> products and options
>> >> In the earlier release the structure of database is changed with
>> three tables:
>> >> products variant option
>> >>
>> >> obviously the structure of the backup have only two tables...
>> >>
>> >> what the best way to return to use the options?
>> >> I have to insert the vaiant table and make a script to convert
>> datas?
>> >> In this case I've to rewrite a lot of software because the previous
>> >> developer have wrote a lot of custo code about option!
>> >>
>> >> Is possibile to use the old option database structure with 5.6?
>> >
>> > Well, you may have to tweak your database a bit, but you can still
>> use
>> > the options table to store the variants.  Just have the following
>> line
>> > in your catalog.cfg file:
>> >
>> > Options Matrix variant_table options
>> >
>> > ...and change the ProductFiles line to:
>> > ProductFiles products options
>> >
>> > ...that should do it.
>> >
>> > Peter
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > interchange-users mailing list
>> > interchange-users at icdevgroup.org
>> > http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> interchange-users mailing list
>> interchange-users at icdevgroup.org
>> http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> interchange-users mailing list
> interchange-users at icdevgroup.org
> http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
>



More information about the interchange-users mailing list