[ic] Failed Payment Processing
Jon
prtyof5 at attglobal.net
Thu Feb 10 22:31:09 EST 2005
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Jon wrote:
>
> > This has happened a few times now and would like to figure out why.
> > At this point I'm not sure which direction to begin looking.
> >
> > I see a double/duplicate charge for an order at the payment gateway
> > (Echo) so I know the CC processing completes. And probably a resubmit by
> > the customer to finally get the order through. However, in the cart's
> > error.log I see 'Safe: Real-time charge failed.' and 'Error during
> > creation of order routing log' In the routing log file I see 'There was
> > an error accepting payment: Real-time charge failed. Reason:'
> >
> > but no reason information provided. To me this seems like a disconnect
> > between the payment gateway responding and IC waiting for a response
> > such as a time out.
>
> Check the interchange-users list archives for "Perl signals problems"
> and/or "PERL_SIGNALS" and "MaxServers". Most payment gateways are called
> as a subprocess from Interchange, and sometimes there are signals problems
> that cause the subprocess to die too soon. You can configure Perl and
> Interchange to avoid the signals problems and often that makes such
> mysterious errors go away.
>
> Jon
>
> --
> Jon Jensen
> End Point Corporation
> http://www.endpoint.com/
> Software development with Interchange, Perl, PostgreSQL, Apache, Linux, ...
> _______________________________________________
>
Appreciate the pointer Jon !! Searching on "Perl signals problems"
yielded a number of hits and the information at this link seems most
appropriate
http://www.icdevgroup.org/pipermail/interchange-users/2002-March/018636.html
The server is currently set in low traffic mode. Based on my symptoms as I've
described and from what I read at that above link in particular and other
links referencing MaxServers 0 I think my first test is to change to RPC and
set MaxServers 0. Does that sound very reasonable in your opinion ?
Since this problem is intermittent additional assurances are very welcome.
Again thanks Jon
Jon
More information about the interchange-users
mailing list